The Real Question

Paul Krugman asks the relevant question. What next? Mitt Romney's boasts about being bi-partisan have been scathingly debunked as no more true than his claims about Jeep production being sent to China. In Massachusetts he was either at war with the Legislature, or trying to alter their work with over 800 line-item vetoes, that they thanked him for by over-riding them, in many cases unanimously. There is s reason that Mitt Romney is polling in the 30s in Massachusetts currently, which is unusual for a former Governor.

But back to Krugman. This really is the argument, isn't it? "If you want a government that works, then it HAS to be Republican or we will never let it function without constant fighting and intransigence, okay?"

In other words, elect us and support us or we will destroy the government and all that it stands for and is attempting to do on behalf of the American people. We don't WANT to have to do this, so the voters need to vote for us so that this will not have to happen.

What an offer. Have some corrupt morons in government, or a working majority of them. Okay, don't rush me now, I have to think about this...
Arthur