
Having Mitt the Barber run for President may have the effect of shining a light
on the ultra-wealthy and their tax benefits. If so, the legacy of Mitt's run
may prove ironically very, very good for our economy and our society, while
leaving all of his exceptionally wealthy friends with a painful hangover,
wishing fervently that Mitt had just stayed home.
I heard this guy on the radio yesterday and he seemed to be making very good
sense. He originally did
this short video for something called "TED", a website
with a series of four to twenty minute clips about various subjects, but the
organizers of "TED" felt that this clip was "too controversial" for them to
post. When something that is not advocating violence or insurrection is seen as
seditious, that can often be a cue that it might be seen as having a
considerable impact on society.
TED is at:
http://www.ted.com/
(BTW:) By the way, I don't know anything about TED, I just found it fascinating
that they were too paranoid to let this guy's video be aired after he recorded
it, lest they invite the wrath of the Entitled Ones. I think his seditious
ideas warrant far more distribution.
Arthur