Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Boys Gone Wild


In all the publicity over former VP "Dick" Cheney and his daughter making the rounds of television programs to talk about how limited the use of "harsh interrogation techniques" was... here comes a fairly articulate former detainee to make a liar out of Cheney. No, they never waterboarded this guy, but they seem to have come up with an entire host of interesting "techniques" designed to wear down detainees and make them sing like songbirds, parroting the words fed to them by their captors. As I heard this guy talk I vaguely remembered the story of six or eight men being arrested in Bosnia who were planning to blow up an American embassy. And then the story died and was never mentioned again and here is an explanation as to why.

Think for a minute if a group of American Red Cross employees had been in Iraq or Morocco and had been falsely charged with some dastardly plan, then exonerated, and another government, oh, let's call it Russia or China for example, had kidnapped them in front of their families as they were being released from prison, rushed them to an airport and flew them to a desert Gulag for them to be tortured and mistreated for more than seven years.

What would we think of a nation that did that? Stop and think of the current uproar over North Korea snatching two American journalists (both employed by a company that Al Gore runs incidentally) and sentencing them to twelve years of hard labor. Oh, the infamy! But in regard to the beam in our own eye (to throw in a Biblical allusion) we say nothing, or we try to dismiss, marginalize, shelve and forget what our nation has done. With regard to Guantanamo Bay we have already released hundreds and hundreds of detainess, pretty much just saying "Oops, so sorry, my bad" and now the courts are forcing us to release people like this, who seem to also have been imprisoned and mistreated for no reason. It raises the question; what was the purpose of the Guantanamo facility? Was it a vast research center, designed to study how to break the will of prisoners? Using as their raw material a large group of people arrested at random? If that sounds like the sort of thing that Stalin or the Communist Chinese did and still do, you are right. Maybe it should have been called Gulag Bay. Let's call it what it was. It was a Concentration Camp, into which marginalized and suspect individuals could be thrown based on false and baseless accusations. In Afghanistan it is said that there was a $20,000 or $30,000 bounty paid for "bad guys". In a lawless culture rag-tag militias used the program as a revenue source, settling personal scores by selling individuals to the US in order to earn blood money. Our armed forces, given conflicting guidance and pressure from above, pretty much ran wild, like drunks on a Spring Break from Hell. Things like this happen in every war, but this became an institutionalized form of stupidity. And we haven't even seen the tip of the iceberg yet.

I remain puzzled by the caution of the Obama administration. I kind of THINK that the reason is that raising the issue will not bring back the dead or heal the abused and their hope is to be able to tackle some massive issues, get them in place, and then come back and make this right. Maybe that is politically smart, but in the meantime I applaud those who are hammering away at our government to force accountability. We need transparency, we need a national discussion of what was done in our names, in the end we will need some form of accountability, though what form that will take is not clear to me. I can only tell you this, no more Medals of Freedom please.

And understand this; what we did as a nation pales beside the horrors of everyday life inside China and many other nations. All one needs to do in China is put a foot wrong and you disappear, sometimes to never be seen again. No one knows how many people there are in Chinese prison camps, but some estimates are as high as 16 to 20 million. Given the size of the areas in China reserved for such "camps", and the great secrecy under which they operate, a high figure like that is possible. Another issue in China is the "harvesting" or human organs for sale to visiting "transplant tourists" by timing executions to their travel schedule. Thrifty, thrifty, thrifty. China has put on nice clothes and some lipstick, but underneath the governing elite are still pigs. But is that the point? That we are less dreadful than Communist China? Wow, what an honor! No, it is time to take back the soul of our country. The world expects no less of us and in fact yearns to have our country to admire once more. Our good name, among nations, was one of our most powerful diplomatic tools. Instead of leading a race to infamy, I for one will be glad when our country gets back on track and takes up in earnest the battle for the welfare of our people, and those of other nations. It is not a zero-sum game. Others do not have to lose for us to win. We probably do need to step up our efforts to control world population, but that is another discussion. And I wish that Right to Lifers would consider the concept of Right to a Decent Quality of Life. Much of the world lives in abject squalor, where human life is in some cases worth less than the life of a cow. If we are all part of the same vast human family, some of our cousins are in trouble. If you were an epidemic, looking for someplace to get a start, where would you begin? In Manhattan, or in the middle of a festering slum in Brazil?



Arthur

Politics


Every once in a while a nation throws an election that harkens back to the glorious days of early democracy. Ironically, there may be such a sprawling, brawling, hot-tempered election going on right now in... Iran. Iran? one axis of the "axis of evil"? Interestingly, it should be noted that hardline President Ahmadinejad was elected in 2004, after President Bush called out Iran as part of the axis of evil, though Iran had been trying to work with the US in regard to controlling the Taliban in Afghanistan. Now, with Obama's election and his speech in Cairo, all bets are off. A more moderate President is likely to be elected, by a convincing majority if this story has it right. And Ahmadinejad? He is not going out without a fight. Since he has backing amongst organized groups of fundamentalist street thugs who are likely to do a lot of stupid things this week, this election could signal a huge shift in direction for Iran. Iran is a very young country, with something like 60% or so of the population under the age of 30. Although satellite dishes are technically illegal, no one cares. Since news only happens on government TV channels, everyone listens to the BBC. There is a restlessness in Iran that seems ready to burst free.

It makes our elections seem tame, doesn't it?

TEHRAN — The leading candidates are accusing each other of corruption, bribery and torture. The wife of the strongest challenger to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has threatened to sue him for defaming her. And every night, parts of the capital become a screaming, honking bacchanal, with thousands of young men dancing and brawling in the streets until dawn.

Arthur

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Weekend Update - D-Day Edition



  • Sorry, Dick. You can't have it. You can't have even a moment of credit, a glimpse of sympathy, any sort of merciful forgiveness just because you sort of, kind of half-assedly came out in support of gay marriage, again, even though you actually didn't. Mark Morford says "Nice Try, Dick."

  • "The Republican Party that is in such disrepute today is not the party of Reagan. It is the party of Rush Limbaugh, of Ann Coulter, of Newt Gingrich, of George W. Bush, of Karl Rove. It is not a conservative party, it is a party built on the blind and narrow pursuit of power." Think some pinko liberal leftie said that? Think again.

  • Here's a shocking little story about Bill O'Reilly being caught in a lie. Okay, so it's not shocking.

  • And speaking of Fox Noise, the Evil Murdock has recently launched a website called Foxnation.com. The Fox Nation has displayed an uncanny ability to mislead readers, twist the truth, spread wild conspiracy theories, and misrepresent the reporting of legitimate journalists and media outlets.

  • President Barack Obama's pick for intelligence chief at the Homeland Security Department withdrew from consideration Friday amid questions about his role in the CIA's interrogations of suspected terrorists. You see, his name was Mudd, with two d's, and ... oh, never mind.

  • Here’s conservative icon and convicted felon G. Gordon Liddy on the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. “Let’s hope that the key conferences aren’t when she’s menstruating or something, or just before she’s going to menstruate. That would really be bad. Lord knows what we would get then.” M. Kane Jeeves asks the all-too important question "At what point, in America, did it become okay to be stupid?"

  • Rachel Maddow investigates the insane claims of Liz Cheney and her father, Darth. Guess what, they're both lying.

  • Here's one that would cause Uncle Bob to break out the brandy: What are Christians to do when faced with evil, logical, scientific reasoning that "mocks the Bible?" Answer: "Christians must learn to think critically, deconstructing the news we read and watch and submitting it to biblical analysis. "

Thursday, June 4, 2009

"Just One Of Him Is Worth Ten George Bushes"


The speech.


The reaction, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.


Coming from the WSJ, that's a rave review. I would agree with the general theme of the article, "Great speech, now what?" I think Obama did a good job of leveling the playing field, recasting the debate; everyone has a position, everyone has complaints, everyone wants something, now what? I don't remember much about the "Road Map" other than that the Bush administration was long on maps, short on being able to read them.

Like many others I consider the Middle East to be the most intractable trouble-spot in the world. There are nukes and nuts and there is a long history of bad decisions. Don't believe me? Relatively few know it, but Israel secretly helped to create Hamas, to act as a religious alternative to Yasser Arafat's Fatah. Boy, that really worked out well, didn't it? Fatah was staggeringly corrupt, Hamas is fanatically nuts. It is hard to choose which one should be more dubious of. In the middle are the Palestinian people, poorly governed and lead, disenfranchised, badly in need of new and more far-sighted leadership. Then there is Israel, expanding into lands taken during the 1967 war, in clear violation of UN orders to not do so. To date the UN has been unable to sanction Israel because the US vetoes any such attempts, but what if we were to stop doing so? And now the Netanyahu government is complaining that they had "side agreements" with Bush that permitted them to expand settlements, even though on paper they agreed not to do so. Brilliant. And we are supposed to honor such secret agreements, even when they violate UN mandates? I suppose we could, but wouldn't that make it far, far more complicated to find peace in the region? It seems to me that the Bush approach to peace in the Middle East produced results all right, but not the results we hoped for.

The best that can be said about George W Bush at this point is that his tenure has had the effect of making pretty much anyone who succeeded him look good. as a man on the street in Cairo said in speaking of Obama, "Just one of him is worth ten George Bushes". Okay, we have ten, shall we try for twenty?

Arthur

Sunday, May 31, 2009

Weekend Update - May 31st



  • California, the unswerving bastion of progressive liberalthink, the frothing epicenter of just about every wild/weird/wonderful sociocultural movement and civil right in America. But boy did they ever screw up that gay marriage thing. Mark Morford apologizes.

  • We love conspiracy theories more than most (Uncle Bob and I could spend hours arguing the finer points of some of them), and here's the top ten conspiracy theories of all time.

  • The revelation this month in GQ Magazine that Donald Rumsfeld as Defense Secretary embellished top-secret wartime memos with quotations from the Bible prompts a question. Why did he believe he could influence President Bush by that means? Well, maybe it has something to do with Bush's belief in Bible monsters named Gog and Magog. Better sit while you're reading this one.

  • "President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, is a proud and accomplished Latina. This fact apparently drives some prominent Republicans to a state resembling incoherent, sputtering rage. " Eugene Robinson comments.

  • Somebody get Mike Huckabee's cell number and tell him the election is over. Seems the Huckster is still campaigning.

  • This is getting even uglier. The commander of Fort Campbell army base in Kentucky has ordered a three-day suspension of regular duties to focus on a spike in suicides among his troops amid concern over a wider trend across the armed services. What's going on?

  • And for what it's worth, here's the video that Shell doesn't want you to see.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

"Semper Fi," My Friend




And so, at long last, he's home to stay.

For the past several months his ashes have been in southern California with his daughter, and this past week he made one more trip north to Oregon. And we all came to see him. All of us Winslows. We placed his ashes in a beautiful little spot a few steps away from his mother and father, as he wished. Looking South, you can see Spencer's Butte where his sister's, my Birth Mother's, ashes were lovingly scattered.

It was a hard day for us. Saying goodbye our Father, Uncle, Friend, Teacher. His son Steve, normally stoic and emotionally strong, broke down during his beautiful eulogy for his father. But with the sadness there was an overriding joy. A joy born from the fact that we had witnessed this man, been so lucky to have known him, to have learned from him, to have been touched by him.

In his memoirs, Uncle Bob makes it clear that he does not consider himself a hero for what he endured as a POW, nor for the rest of his exemplary service in the Marine Corps. "There seems to be a human tendency to exaggerate the difficulties of a difficult experience, especially of doing so makes one's experience seem more heroic. And so it goes, with many of the stories told by Wake Islanders.... I was not then, nor am now, a hero."

I've argued that point with him before, and if he were here now I'd continue that argument. Those of us who knew him can say the same thing: He was MY hero.

My 10-year-old son wrote a letter to Uncle Bob and placed it next to the urn before it was covered with Oregon earth. I peeked at that note on the way to the cemetery, and while it was all personal between my son and his Uncle, he wrote something that says it all. "You were the best Uncle in the whole world. Goodbye Uncle Bob, Love, Jonathan."


Stand down, Sgt. Major. Rest In Peace.

Tech Stuff


Okay, here is what I know that you all have been waiting for, a steaming hot update on Internet technology! No? Really? You waste parts of your life on the Internet wasting your time reading Bad Hat and you don't really care what it's all about and how it all works? And that website you monitor? You know, "Steaming Hot Babes holding Cute Puppies"? And you never thought about the broader implications of what is going on?

In the meantime there are some interesting things happening in terms of the social and political impact of the Internet. Facebook. Kid's stuff? Umm, maybe, except that the most viable moderate challenger to President Ahmadinejad of Iran set up a clever and dynamic Facebook page designed to keep his fans informed about his campaign and send them details and dates of upcoming campaign rallies, some of them drawing 30,000 participants. Why did he do that? Maybe because the official media in Iran was sort of told to ignore him. The current President of Iran has to pay people to come to his rallies and send buses to pick them up, presumably because he is sooo popular. Not. The current President of Iran, who is also a hypocritical moron, was recently forced to explain that it was someone else in the government, not he, who mysteriously blocked access to Facebook to all Iranians. Think about that for a bit. Change is coming everywhere. The Genie is out of the bottle. Doubtless Ahmadinejad's minions are feverishly working on THEIR Facebook page, but it will be a matter of too little, too late. The odds are fair that Iran will soon have a new and more moderate President, in part thanks to Facebook. Since that could stop a war and help calm regional tensions in the Middle East, I for one think that's a really, really big deal. Governments try to control what their citizens know and think, but if there are independant sources of news and connections, that is significantly harder to do.

Another fun fact about Facebook? Russia just made a massive purchase of its stock. Say what? What the heck were the Russians thinking? No one really knows, though speculation is running wild.

If you have the patience, read through this fairly dry article, which tries to be breathless and hot, but you know how hot scientists are. Their hot is our luke-warm. But there are some facts in there that bear consideration. The number of possible links to the Internet is about to get really, really large. I cannot tell whether it is 340 trillion, or 340 trillion, trillion, trillion, as is written here. Either way, it's a ton. The author, no fool, suggests that every part in a car could separately report to a central communications point how well it is performing and wearing. Really? Kind of quantum leap beyond testing the compression, isn't it? But leaving aside car parts, pretty much everything else could be connected to everything else, to whatever extent that made sense.

Some years back I took two half-time sabbaticals to work in my kids' schools on their computer technology program when they were in 4th to 7th grade. Very rewarding to do so and I learned a ton about networking and computers. The Superintendant took me to lunch one day to thank me, which was sweet of her and at one point in our discussion of "networking" we came around to the role of the Internet going forward. I explained to her that there really is just one network in the world, that the issue is not so much building networks in schools as in connecting them to the one great network that binds us all. Kind of like the one great union. I vividly recall her eyes beginning to glaze over, wondering if I was about to start frothing at the mouth, but that is all it is; one big network, that binds every human being and every computer on the planet into a unified whole, capable of doing great good, capable of great abuse, very close to being able to erase the gulf of the different languages and cultures that divide us. Too nuts to qualify? Have you run a translation program on a website recently? They are fairly dreadful, but they are a start. Have you watched a sympathetic video of people in another country? The effect is amazing. My God, they are just people! Who knew? And when we can all see each other, and speak to each other, however haltingly and awkwardly, who can say what effect that will have? I can't, but I think that it will change history, not because anyone set out to change history by creating the Internet, but because a bunch of techno-geeks thought it would be cool to set up a really big network and see if they could send messages over it. And that is how history gets made.


Arthur